Suicides Following Police Custody Reach Nine-Year High

Data supplied by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) point out that only for the last year 64 people have committed suicide within two days of release from police custody.

The number for 2011/2012 was only 39 which means that the increase is now significant.May be if these people get proper treatment and help, they could find employment, which will prevent them from commiting a suicide. We have employment document templates, which might be tailored to suit every employer`s needs.

Two thirds of those who were in custody had mental health concerns, 18 were caught because of sexual offences, and other seven have previously been detained under the Mental Health Act.

The chairwoman of the IPCC, Dame Anne Owers, said these figures showed that police is not trained enough in order to deal with people having mental health issues.

“The police are often called in to deal with acutely mentally ill people, who may be a danger to themselves or others or who may be behaving in a disturbing or strange way,” she said. “It is clearly important that they are better trained in mental health awareness.”

According to Deborah Coles, from the charity Inquest, the high number of people who took their lives after they went out of police custody was alarming.  She added that the country needed urgent changes in the national strategy towards those with mental problems. This is the only way, which would change police culture and practice.

IPCC, on the other hand also released information that less people have died in police custody compared to the years since 2004. Another thing mentioned was that there were no fatal police shootings.

Despite this, the number of people who have died during police pursuits is large. Out of 30 road traffic fatalities 26 people lost their lives in police pursuits.

 

Jobseekers’ Work Programme Does not Help Disadvantaged People

MPs on the Work and Pensions Committee expressed their concerns about the government’s Work Programme aiming to find job for people who could not find one for a year or more. According to them the new scheme for getting jobless people back to work does not work property mainly for those at the greatest disadvantage.

The committee announced it had serious doubts about the fact that the programme was improving, mentioning the fact that homeless people, disabled people and such with alcohol, drug and other problems were in fact being ignored and no one was eager to provide them with an employment contract.

When the scheme was launched in June 2011 it showed a really low success rate. Critics opposed to it when they found out that it missed the government’s 5.5% target as it was revealed that only 3.5% of those being part of the programme found jobs for six months or more. Most of them have filled in a Job Application form.

The main aim of the scheme is to propose to its clients such positions at which they could remain for significant amounts of time.

It cannot be hidden that the latest data point out that the outcomes have improved for the majority of the people but disadvantaged jobseekers cannot say the same thing.

What worries most of the people now is the fact that job providers would give job to those with biggest chances to find one and will not care enough for the rest who are really in need.

Dame Anne Begg, who chairs the Work and Pensions Committee, commented: “It is clear that the differential pricing structure is not a panacea for tackling creaming and parking. The Government must do more to ensure that the Work Programme provides effective support for all jobseekers, not just the ones who are easiest to help.”